Overall, participants stated that they didn’t experience their intimate orientation being a option.

Overall, participants stated that they didn’t experience their intimate orientation being a option.

Identification Commitment and Community Identification

IHP ratings were computed by summing reactions into the things and dividing by 3 (reactions towards the “glad to be L/G/B/Q/H” item were reversed). This process yielded a scale score (α = 0.82) which could consist of 1 to 5, with greater ratings indicating more negative attitudes toward or greater distancing that is psychological one’s sexual minority identity (Herek et al. 2009). Footnote 10 As suggested because of the fairly low overall IHP mean score ( dining Table 3), participants generally speaking expressed good emotions about their sexual orientation identification. Certainly, just 6% of participants manifested a broad pattern of contract with statements expressing negative emotions about one’s sexual orientation (i.e., scored 4 or greater). The best level of identity distancing ended up being seen among bisexual males, whom scored dramatically greater than lesbians but whose mean rating ended up being however underneath the hypothetical midpoint associated with the scale. Footnote 11

The 2 products evaluating community recognition are not considerably intercorrelated (r = в€’0.09) and therefore had been analyzed individually. 继续阅读“Overall, participants stated that they didn’t experience their intimate orientation being a option.”